maintenance memory vs autovac

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: maintenance memory vs autovac
Date: 2008-12-02 13:38:49
Message-ID: 49353A69.20001@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Would it make sense to be able to configure maintenance_work_mem
specifically for the autovacuum processes? Given that there can be a
number of them, it might be good to be able to have one default for all
*other* processes, and a separate one from the ones kicked off by autovac?

//Magnus

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-12-02 13:52:30 Re: [BUG] lo_open() makes a warning/falls to an assertion
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-12-02 13:38:34 pg_stat_all_tables vs NULLs