Re: max_fsm_relations

From: Adam Radłowski <adamr(at)informatyka(dot)gdansk(dot)pl>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: max_fsm_relations
Date: 2008-12-01 16:43:19
Message-ID: 49341427.7020601@informatyka.gdansk.pl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Now I got full information. Big thanks.
Adam

Alvaro Herrera pisze:
> Adam Radłowski wrote:
>> So, are You suggesting, that at the time of full database vacuuming,
>> some of tables are not vacuumed, when "max_fsm_relations" is to small ?
>
> No. They will all be vacuumed. The difference is that the space
> reclaimed by vacuum will not be reused unless it is recorded by the FSM.
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Isabella Ghiurea 2008-12-01 20:50:59 change user passwd
Previous Message Daniel Cristian Cruz 2008-12-01 15:21:15 Re: Not so simple query and a half million loop