| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Dickson S(dot) Guedes" <guediz(at)gmail(dot)com>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Comments to Synchronous replication patch v3 |
| Date: | 2008-11-25 18:12:50 |
| Message-ID: | 492C4022.5090806@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Fujii Masao escribió:
>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Dickson S. Guedes escribió:
>>>> Fujii Masao escreveu:
>>>>> (...)
>>>>>> Even if we need to have the database in real, I'd like to use another
>>>>>> name for it. The name 'walsender' seems to be an internal module name
>>>>>> but it should be a feature name (ex. 'replication').
>>>>>>
>>>>> Agreed. The name 'replication' is more suitable, I also think.
>>>>> Any other ideas?
>>>> 'walsender' should be a schema in the 'replication' database. Other
>>>> modules, in replication feature, could be placed there too.
>>> Hmm, what is this database there for?
>> It's for authentication for replication. This was discussed before.
>> Please see the following thread and feel free to comment.
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-11/msg00187.php
>
> Hmm ... I think this means that the suggestion by Dickson does not make
> much sense, right?
Right.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-11-25 19:13:07 | Re: Review: Hot standby |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-11-25 17:15:36 | Re: Snapshot warning |