Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: Adrian Klaver <aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time
Date: 2008-11-21 17:48:21
Message-ID: 4926F465.1030307@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Adrian Klaver wrote:
>> Yes, my perception also is that it's getting harder and harder to keep
>> up with the list traffic; so something is happening that a simple
>> volume count doesn't capture.
>
> I am still relatively new to Postgres, but my impression is that the questions
> have gotten harder/more in depth. Fewer, How do you pronounce Postgres? and
> more, Explain the various isolation levels for transactions and how does that
> affect my particular situation?

This is definitely the case. Whether it's because the documentation is
better, or we're getting a more sophisticated user the questions are
certainly more involved.

Some of the EXPLAINs on the performance list are practically impossible
to read unless you've got the time to cut+paste and fix line-endings.

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ciprian Dorin Craciun 2008-11-21 17:58:29 Re: Using Postgres to store high volume streams of sensor readings
Previous Message Daniel Verite 2008-11-21 17:47:03 Re: Prepared statement already exists