| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_rewind race condition just after promotion |
| Date: | 2021-11-09 11:31:51 |
| Message-ID: | 492590F3-9566-4AC2-986D-6CFB35B110CD@yesql.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 14 Jul 2021, at 14:03, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> wrote:
>
> The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> make installcheck-world: tested, passed
> Implements feature: tested, passed
> Spec compliant: tested, passed
> Documentation: tested, passed
>
> The v3 patch LGTM. I wonder if we should explicitly say in pg_rewind tests that
> they _don't_ have to call `checkpoint`, or otherwise, we will lose the test
> coverage for this scenario. But I don't have a strong opinion on this one.
>
> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer
Heikki, do you have plans to address this patch during this CF?
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com | 2021-11-09 11:35:24 | RE: Failed transaction statistics to measure the logical replication progress |
| Previous Message | vignesh C | 2021-11-09 11:15:36 | Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes |