Re: pg_rewind race condition just after promotion

From: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: pg_rewind race condition just after promotion
Date: 2021-07-14 12:03:22
Message-ID: 162626420228.1167.13414583689741111142.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, passed
Implements feature: tested, passed
Spec compliant: tested, passed
Documentation: tested, passed

The v3 patch LGTM. I wonder if we should explicitly say in pg_rewind tests that
they _don't_ have to call `checkpoint`, or otherwise, we will lose the test
coverage for this scenario. But I don't have a strong opinion on this one.

The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2021-07-14 12:05:27 Re: Toast compression method options
Previous Message vignesh C 2021-07-14 11:58:21 Re: Enhance traceability of wal_level changes for backup management