From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pierrick <pierrick(dot)chovelon(at)dalibo(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Only one version can be installed when using extension_control_path |
Date: | 2025-09-08 15:35:42 |
Message-ID: | 492144.1757345742@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Monday, September 8, 2025, Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>> On this step it will search the .control
>> file on paths at extension_control_path in order and it will use the
>> first one that it finds and based on the .control file found it will
>> install the extension using the version specified on the command.
> Then pg_available_extensions seems broken - it lists extensions as
> available that are not accessible to the user due to this policy. Maybe we
> need to add something indicating that certain rows are hidden behind the
> present path setting which would need to be changed if one wishes to
> install them. Also seems like the extension location should be part of the
> output too.
Between this and previously-identified problems (commits 81eaaa2c4,
f777d7738), it seems clear that extension_control_path (which is a new
thing in v18) was very poorly thought out. I wonder if it's too late
to revert it so that we can redesign it more carefully.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Melanie Plageman | 2025-09-08 15:40:14 | Re: Parallel heap vacuum |
Previous Message | Zsolt Parragi | 2025-09-08 15:31:07 | Re: OAuth client code doesn't work with Google OAuth |