Re: Using index for IS NULL query

From: Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>
To:
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using index for IS NULL query
Date: 2008-11-13 00:27:31
Message-ID: 491B7473.3050407@fuzzy.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Well, you're obviously right - I didn't know this. I guess I've found
that the index is not used for null values, and deduced somehow that
NULL values are not stored in the index.

Thanks, it's nice to find out a 'bug' before it's too late :-)

regards
Tomas

> Are you sure NULL values are not stored? btree, gist and bitmap index
> and search for NULL values.
>
> select amname, amindexnulls, amsearchnulls from pg_am;
>
> amname | amindexnulls | amsearchnulls
> --------+--------------+---------------
> btree | t | t
> hash | f | f
> gist | t | t
> gin | f | f
> bitmap | t | t
> (5 rows)
>
>
> Sincerely yours,
> Vladimir Sitnikov

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2008-11-13 02:26:02 Re: Performance Question
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2008-11-13 00:20:11 Re: slow full table update