Re: Second thoughts about pg_typeof

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Second thoughts about pg_typeof
Date: 2008-11-03 20:47:54
Message-ID: 490F637A.5060302@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> I wonder if pg_typeof() should be marked stable instead of immutable?
> Its results certainly depend on the contents of system catalogs ...
>
>
>

makes sense.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-11-03 20:53:20 Re: [PATCH] PageGetTempPage cleanup
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-11-03 20:38:28 Second thoughts about pg_typeof