| From: | Kyle Cordes <kyle(at)kylecordes(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Decreasing WAL size effects |
| Date: | 2008-10-30 22:11:21 |
| Message-ID: | 490A3109.8060602@kylecordes.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark wrote:
> Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> writes:
>
> Wouldn't it be just as good to indicate to the archive command the amount of
> real data in the wal file and have it only bother copying up to that point?
That sounds like a great solution to me; ideally it would be done in a
way that is always on (i.e. no setting, etc.).
On the log-recovery side, PG would need to be willing to accept
shorter-than-usual segments, if it's not already willing.
--
Kyle Cordes
http://kylecordes.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2008-10-30 22:23:03 | Re: Decreasing WAL size effects |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-30 22:03:52 | Re: Are there plans to add data compression feature to postgresql? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2008-10-30 22:23:03 | Re: Decreasing WAL size effects |
| Previous Message | Christophe | 2008-10-30 21:57:58 | Re: Decreasing WAL size effects |