Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: User defined I/O conversion casts

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: User defined I/O conversion casts
Date: 2008-10-30 13:46:18
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> Yeah, a magical OID clearly has some issues. A new field in pg_cast is 
>> the obvious alternative. How about adding a "castmethod" char field, 
>> with values:
>> b = binary-compatible cast (CREATE CAST ... WITHOUT FUNCTION)
>> i = I/O coercion cast (the new beast, CREATE CAST ... WITH INOUT)
>> f = use cast function specified in castfunc field.
>> castfunc is 0 for methods b and i.
> Seems sane to me.  If you do that, please add a check in the opr_sanity
> regression test that castfunc is nonzero if and only if castmethod is f.

Ok, will do.

   Heikki Linnakangas

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2008-10-30 13:48:54
Subject: Re: Please make sure your patches are on the wiki page
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-10-30 13:37:37
Subject: Re: User defined I/O conversion casts

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group