Re: Block level concurrency during recovery

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Block level concurrency during recovery
Date: 2008-10-23 17:24:11
Message-ID: 4900B33B.4040508@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 19:21 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> You have other issues with those still, namely that
>> table locks are not yet taken appropriately, so I'm not sure if this is
>> worth worrying about until that's done.
>
> Please explain. If you know of a correctness issue, please say.

Things like DROP TABLE need to take an AccessExclusiveLock, and you
don't have that yet, no?

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2008-10-23 17:26:36 Re: psql Feature request \set query
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-10-23 17:16:26 Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby utility and administrator functions