Re: Deriving Recovery Snapshots

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Deriving Recovery Snapshots
Date: 2008-10-23 10:40:01
Message-ID: 49005481.2060705@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> The patch isn't ready to apply standalone because we need to include the
> changes to XidInMVCCSnapshot() also, which would take a little while to
> extract. Let me know if that is worth producing a standalone patch for.

FWIW, this patch becomes a lot simpler if you don't change the function
signature, and don't move the SubtransSetParent() call.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
xsubtrans.v1.simpler.patch text/x-diff 1.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-10-23 11:29:44 EXPLAIN CREATE TABLE AS
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-10-23 08:57:34 Re: Block level concurrency during recovery