From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Removing binaries (was: createlang/droplang deprecated) |
Date: | 2017-03-19 12:14:42 |
Message-ID: | 48ae9bcb-71f7-afea-5ae3-e7adea48e117@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/18/2017 01:12 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net <mailto:magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>> writes:
>>> 2017-03-18 14:00 GMT+01:00 Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com <mailto:peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>>:
> createuser, dropuser - definitely pollutes the namespace, people do
> sometimes try them for the wrong thing. Unlike the db ones they do add
> value though -- I don't think we have a psql way of in a single command
> doing what --pwprompt on createuser does, do we? But given that we are
> in the process of breaking a lot of other scripts for 10, perhaps we
> should rename it to pg_createuser?
We have one chance in the near future to shake things up, break things
for the better and lose a lot of long time issues. Making things
consistent and declarative (pg_ for example) is a great opportunity.
+1
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2017-03-19 12:44:53 | Re: Removing binaries (was: createlang/droplang deprecated) |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-03-19 11:32:50 | Re: PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan |