| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: crypt auth |
| Date: | 2008-10-22 12:01:26 |
| Message-ID: | 48FF1616.2020705@hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>>> AFAICT, removing an authentication method requires a protocol version
>>> bump.
>>
>> Why would it require that? There would just be some auth method codes
>> that remain reserved but aren't used anymore.
>
> Yeah, I was mistaken. AuthenticationCryptPassword would remain in the
> protocol definition, but the server would just never send it.
Since I've seen no actual objections to this happening, I will go ahead
and do it unless someone objects explicitly :-)
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Chernow | 2008-10-22 12:07:36 | Re: binary representation of datatypes |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-10-22 11:58:24 | Re: Deriving Recovery Snapshots |