SQL:2008 LIMIT/OFFSET

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: SQL:2008 LIMIT/OFFSET
Date: 2008-10-20 09:16:32
Message-ID: 48FC4C70.8030407@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

SQL:2008 specifies the following syntax for what we have so far called
LIMIT and OFFSET

SELECT ... [ ORDER BY ... ]
OFFSET num {ROW|ROWS} FETCH {FIRST|NEXT} [num] {ROW|ROWS} ONLY

For example,

SELECT id, name FROM tab1 ORDER BY id OFFSET 20 ROWS FETCH NEXT 10 ROWS
ONLY;

(I understand this syntax was taken from IBM.)

Supporting this in PostgreSQL poses a couple of parsing challenges that
involve some tradeoffs. I have attached a draft patch if you want to
follow along.

FETCH must become reserved. It's in the same position now that LIMIT
and OFFSET are already. This should be OK because FETCH is already a
well-known SQL command for cursor use.

The trailing {ROW|ROWS} key words plus the fact that the number
specification is optional after FETCH (defaulting to 1) cause some
independent problems because ROWS is unreserved and ROW can introduce an
expression (c_expr even).

If we want to avoid reshuffling the expression syntax (always good to
avoid) and avoid making ROWS reserved, we need to make some arbitrary
restrictions on what kinds of expressions can be used in these clauses.
Considering that specifying arbitrary expressions in these places
isn't terribly common and the SQL standard only calls for literals, I
hope I have found a good balance that satisfies the letter of the
standard and works well in practice with some parentheses needed in
complicated cases. But it may be objected to because it creates some
inconsistencies between the traditional and the new syntax in more
complex cases.

Another question, if we want to go this route, is whether we would want
to change the query tree reversing to use the new syntax.

Comments?

Attachment Content-Type Size
sql2008-offset-limit.diff text/plain 2.5 KB

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Wanner 2008-10-20 09:23:07 Re: Block-level CRC checks
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-10-20 09:02:58 crypt auth