| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chander Ganesan <chander(dot)ganesan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Chander Ganesan <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Finding some bug statistics.. |
| Date: | 2008-10-02 20:16:16 |
| Message-ID: | 48E52C10.1060000@hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Chander Ganesan wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>>> Also, is the sequence only a sequence, or is some of the data held in
>>> the
>>> database (queryable?) At the very least, I could probably get an
>>> idea of
>>> the bug submit rate by looking at the first bug of each month in the
>>> bugs
>>> archive (or are many of the "bugs" really SPAM)?
>>>
>>
>> It's literally just a sequence. And the messages do get moderated, so
>> some numbers will be lost as spam.
>>
> Wow. Looks like even if we look at just the sequence value, over the
> course of a year, the number of "bugs" (many of which might be
> documentation related, or "not a bug" bugs) submitted via the form is
> less than the number that MySQL gets in two months.
Well, it's not a realistic metric. To be fair, we get a number of bug
reports that do not come through that webform as well. So it really has
on real bearing at all on how many bug reports there are.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2008-10-03 00:33:00 | Re: Finding some bug statistics.. |
| Previous Message | Chander Ganesan | 2008-10-02 17:04:30 | Re: Finding some bug statistics.. |