Re: Interval output bug in HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP

From: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Interval output bug in HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP
Date: 2008-10-02 17:11:10
Message-ID: 48E500AE.2000408@cheapcomplexdevices.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, bug all the way back --- applied.
> I don't much like the forced rounding to two digits here, but changing
> that doesn't seem like material for back-patching. Are you going to
> fix that up while working on your other patches?

Gladly. I hate that too.

I think I can also re-factor some of the copy-paste there
to remove about 200 lines of code duplicated between the interval
styles. I'll get this one in there as well, and try posting
a cleanup patch tonight.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aidan Van Dyk 2008-10-02 17:19:16 Re: Block-level CRC checks
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-10-02 17:07:31 Re: Block-level CRC checks