From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tommy Gildseth <tommy(dot)gildseth(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no> |
Cc: | paul(at)wayr(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: dedicated server & postgresql 8.1 conf tunning |
Date: | 2008-10-02 09:07:43 |
Message-ID: | 48E48F5F.6050703@archonet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Tommy Gildseth wrote:
> Richard Huxton wrote:
>> paul(at)wayr(dot)org wrote:
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Unfornatly, i can't update pgsql to 8.3 since it's not in debian stable.
>>
>> That's why backports.org was invented :-)
>> Or does can't mean "not allowed to"?
>
> Well, running production servers from backports can be a risky
> proposition too, and can land you in situations like the one discussed
> in "Debian packages for Postgres 8.2" from the General list.
Well, there's a reason why "stable" is a popular choice for production
servers. I must admit that I build from source for my PostgreSQL
packages (because I care which version I run). I was reading one of the
Perl fellows recommending the same.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Віталій Тимчишин | 2008-10-02 09:42:15 | Delete performance again |
Previous Message | Thomas Spreng | 2008-10-02 08:37:30 | Re: dedicated server & postgresql 8.1 conf tunning |