| From: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: September CommitFest Closed |
| Date: | 2008-10-01 23:18:22 |
| Message-ID: | 48E4053E.8010206@zeut.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> For the September commitfest, 29 patches were applied (one to pgFoundry)
> and 18 patches were sent back for more work.
>
> More importantly, six *new* reviewers completed reviews of of various
> patches: Abbas Butt, Alex Hunsaker, Markus Wanner, Ibrar Ahmed, Ryan
> Bradetich and Gianni Colli. Several other new reviewers volunteered,
> but we ran out of patches to check, and Kenneth Marshall had to quit
> reviewing because of Hurricane Ike.
>
> Yaaaaay, reviewers.
If nothing else ever came of the Commit Fest approach, if it creates
more reviewers, then I think the Commit Fest process would be a success.
I think the Commit Fest approach does this by lowering the bar of entry
to become a reviewer. It does this because it brings more focus to
patch review on a regular basis and since it changes the patch review
process from a last minute dash that only experience hackers should get
involved with to a process with more time before the final deadline,
hence more friendly for new reviewers to get involved. Good news all
around!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-10-01 23:29:21 | Re: Block-level CRC checks |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-01 23:05:29 | Re: Block-level CRC checks |