| From: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep) |
| Date: | 2008-09-25 00:19:54 |
| Message-ID: | 48DAD92A.6010909@ak.jp.nec.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I am not arguing for or against this patch now, but I would like to know
> whether someone has an agenda for it. Without an agenda, future
> maintenance will be difficult. Reference to standards or other public
> documents would work best to define that agenda.
It is a bit old, but describes whole of the SE-PostgreSQL.
http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepgsql_security_guide.20080214.en.pdf
I think it has to be updated to reflect for the recent updates like
implementation changes in row-level access controls.
In addition, I also think maintenance of the feature is primarily
my work, no need to say.
Thanks,
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2008-09-25 00:26:06 | Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep) |
| Previous Message | Benedek László | 2008-09-24 22:16:52 | Re: pg_dump roles support |