Re: Commitfest patches mostly assigned ... status

From: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Commitfest patches mostly assigned ... status
Date: 2008-09-12 09:44:00
Message-ID: 48CA39E0.6000605@ak.jp.nec.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Hackers,
>
> At this point, almost all patches have been assigned to reviewers. If
> you submitted a patch and don't get feedback by Saturday, take a look at
> who's in the "reviewers" column and send them a query. Since I have no
> way to track when patches are assigned to reviewers, I have no idea if
> some of them are sitting on their hands.
:
> Note that patches need not have only one reviewer! If you have time,
> please take on testing some of the more complex patches, especially:
> Column-level Permissions
> Common Table Expressions
> SE-PostgreSQL patches

I updated my patches:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-09/msg00859.php

It contains rebasing to the latest CVS HEAD, a new hook to avoid
bypass access controls, and a small fix.

In addition, I tried to attach several short explanations about key points
to understand the big patch. I wrote the documentation of SE-PostgreSQL,
but it is not a description for *the patch*.
If reviewers have any unclear things, please feel free to ask me.

Thanks,
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-09-12 10:00:09 Re: Transaction Snapshots and Hot Standby
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2008-09-12 09:40:58 Re: New FSM patch