Re: Proposed patch: make SQL interval-literal syntaxwork per spec

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>,"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Kevin Grittner" <Kgrittn(dot)CCAP(dot)Courts(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Subject: Re: Proposed patch: make SQL interval-literal syntaxwork per spec
Date: 2008-09-11 00:10:17
Message-ID: 48C81B99.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:

> (4) I'm not 100% sure on this one, but it seemed to me that they
were
> requiring year to be four digits and other components (except for
> fractional seconds) to be two digits.

That can't be right. Maybe I saw that in datetime literal specs.

Apologies.

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-09-11 00:21:27 Re: Proposed patch: make SQL interval-literal syntax work per spec
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-09-11 00:07:55 Transaction Snapshots and Hot Standby