| From: | Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers ML <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Keeping creation time of objects |
| Date: | 2008-09-10 07:56:54 |
| Message-ID: | 48C77DC6.6040703@wildenhain.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 15:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> why would creation time (as opposed to any other time, eg last schema
>> modification, last data modification, yadda yadda) be especially
>> significant?
> Hmm, those would be cool, too.
maybe except last data modification.
But for audit reasons its really helpful so see if
someone has had hands on objects since they have
been created. So if it would not cost us arm and leg
I'm all for having created/changed timestamps for
all objects.
Regards
Tino
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-09-10 08:03:30 | Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-09-10 07:19:16 | Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication |