Re: BUG #4340: SECURITY: Is SSL Doing Anything?

From: Dan Kaminsky <dan(at)doxpara(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #4340: SECURITY: Is SSL Doing Anything?
Date: 2008-08-19 19:13:16
Message-ID: 48AB1B4C.6030300@doxpara.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>
>> (I don't believe OpenSSL does this verification either, because AFAICS
>> OpenSSL only ever sees the IP address of the server, and not the FQDN)
>>
>
> In common usages libpq doesn't have the FQDN of the server either.
> To impose such a requirement, we'd have to forbid naming the server
> by IP address or via a domain-search-path abbreviation.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Well, right now, SSL does nothing for you, so you have to do something.
It's OK, SSL isn't doing a lot for a lot of people, but this is the
beginning of us calling people out on that.

You can handle IP address and domain-search-path by having an option for
explicitly declaring the subject name to be expected at the other side
of the SSL connection. In other words, sever the DNS/FQDN link, and
just explicitly say "however I reach that host over there, I expect
database.backend.com".

--Dan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2008-08-19 19:28:49 Re: BUG #4340: SECURITY: Is SSL Doing Anything?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-08-19 19:01:36 Re: BUG #4340: SECURITY: Is SSL Doing Anything?