Re: Postgres-R

From: Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
To: "K, Niranjan (NSN - IN/Bangalore)" <niranjan(dot)k(at)nsn(dot)com>
Cc: ext leiyonghua <leiyonghua(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres-R
Date: 2008-08-19 12:04:46
Message-ID: 48AAB6DE.1070801@bluegap.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

K, Niranjan (NSN - IN/Bangalore) wrote:
> Thanks for the information.
> For Step5 (starting ensemble daemon).-
> I set the multicast address to both nodes (Node 1& Node 2 eth0: 224.0.0.9/4) before starting the ensemble. And started the server application mtalk in node 1 & node 2 and then client application in node 1 & node 2. But the count of members ('nmembers') show as 1. This is the output of the client program 'c_mtalk'. Seeing this, I'am assuming that the applications are not merged.

This sounds like IP multicast does not work properly for your network
(is IP multicast available and enabled for your OS? Maybe you are
running on virtual hosts with a virtual network, which doesn't support
multicasting?). You can either try to fix that or switch to using a
gossip process.

Regards

Markus Wanner

In response to

  • Re: Postgres-R at 2008-08-18 14:12:15 from K, Niranjan (NSN - IN/Bangalore)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-08-19 14:25:02 Re: possible minor EXPLAIN bug?
Previous Message Markus Wanner 2008-08-19 11:59:58 Re: Postgres-R