Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> If we are not doing a scan_all and we fail to acquire a clean-up lock on
> the last block, and the last block reports that it needs freezing, then we
> continue on to wait for the clean-up lock. But there is no need, we don't
> really need to freeze the block, and we already know whether it has tuples
> or not without the clean up lock. Couldn't we just set the flag based on
> hastup, then 'continue'?
Uh, isn't that what my patch is doing?
regards, tom lane