| From: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: CommitFest dragging? |
| Date: | 2008-07-20 22:20:46 |
| Message-ID: | 4883BA3E.8050602@esilo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 10:17 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> It's been 3 weeks since the start of the commitfest, and less than half
>>> the patches have been committed or sent back. We seem to be stalled.
>
>
libpq object hooks, now called libpq events, can be pushed back to the september
commitfest. We would love to get it reviewed now but we are deeply involved in
a company project and the commitfest seems to be a bit behind. The two combined
make for a good push back candidate.
Do we need to add this patch to the sept commitfest? How would we remove it
from the current one?
--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-07-20 22:38:00 | Re: CommitFest dragging? |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-07-20 21:59:40 | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance |