| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: COPY FREEZE has no warning |
| Date: | 2013-01-26 04:08:56 |
| Message-ID: | 4883.1359173336@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> ! ereport(ERROR,
> ! (ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE,
> ! errmsg("cannot perform FREEZE because of previous table activity in the current transaction")));
[ itch... ] What is "table activity"? I always thought of tables as
being rather passive objects. And anyway, isn't this backwards? What
we're complaining of is *lack* of activity. I don't see why this isn't
using the same message as the other code path, namely
> + ereport(ERROR,
> + (ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE,
> + errmsg("cannot perform FREEZE because the table was not created or truncated in the current transaction")));
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2013-01-26 04:20:56 | Re: Visual Studio 2012 RC |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-01-26 03:59:28 | Re: COPY FREEZE has no warning |