Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: martin(dot)chantler(at)convergys(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database?
Date: 2000-11-30 15:42:00
Message-ID: 4875.975598920@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-sql

martin(dot)chantler(at)convergys(dot)com writes:
> I tried this out by running 2 VB programs via ODBC than randomly
> performed queries - they appeared to work in parallel - however I then
> started a PSQL session and entered a slow query it appeared to stop
> the 2 VB programs until it had completed. Anyone got the answer to
> this???

With only that amount of detail, there is no answer. Some things run
in parallel, some things interlock; but you didn't tell us what your
test case was.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alistair Hopkins 2000-11-30 15:44:28 RE: Built in Functions use with recordsets
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-11-30 15:39:21 Re: Built in Functions use with recordsets

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brian C. Doyle 2000-11-30 16:41:33 Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database?
Previous Message martin.chantler 2000-11-30 14:50:04 Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database?