From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | martin(dot)chantler(at)convergys(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database? |
Date: | 2000-11-30 15:42:00 |
Message-ID: | 4875.975598920@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-sql |
martin(dot)chantler(at)convergys(dot)com writes:
> I tried this out by running 2 VB programs via ODBC than randomly
> performed queries - they appeared to work in parallel - however I then
> started a PSQL session and entered a slow query it appeared to stop
> the 2 VB programs until it had completed. Anyone got the answer to
> this???
With only that amount of detail, there is no answer. Some things run
in parallel, some things interlock; but you didn't tell us what your
test case was.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alistair Hopkins | 2000-11-30 15:44:28 | RE: Built in Functions use with recordsets |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-30 15:39:21 | Re: Built in Functions use with recordsets |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brian C. Doyle | 2000-11-30 16:41:33 | Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database? |
Previous Message | martin.chantler | 2000-11-30 14:50:04 | Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database? |