| From: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements |
| Date: | 2008-07-07 13:58:17 |
| Message-ID: | 487220F9.4010403@sigaev.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> I looked this over and it looks good in general. I was only wondering
> about for single-column indexes -- we're storing attribute numbers too,
> right?
No, GinState->oneCol field signals to GinFormTuple and
gin_index_getattr/gintuple_get_attrnum about actual storage.
Single column index is binary compatible with current index :)
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-07-07 14:03:40 | Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements |
| Previous Message | Bernd Helmle | 2008-07-07 13:46:38 | Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-07-07 14:03:40 | Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-07-07 13:45:33 | Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements |