Re: case dumbiness in return from functions

From: Alban Hertroys <dalroi(at)solfertje(dot)student(dot)utwente(dot)nl>
To: Nico Sabbi <nsabbi(at)officinedigitali(dot)it>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: case dumbiness in return from functions
Date: 2008-01-18 12:42:50
Message-ID: 485D882F-C087-4DAD-A2DC-EA4B49032678@solfertje.student.utwente.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Jan 18, 2008, at 1:14 PM, Nico Sabbi wrote:
> Tom Lane ha scritto:
>> The SQL standard specifies that unquoted identifiers are case-
>> insensitive.
^^^^^^^^

>> You're welcome to spell them as camelCase in your source code if you
>> feel like it, but don't expect that PG, or any other SQL-compliant
>> database, will pay attention.
>>
>> regards, tom lane

> yet I find disturbing that Postgres doesn't make the effort
> to respect the case specified by the user. If I created a field
> called "REF" why should Postgres call it "ref" in the output of
> queries
> if the standard doesn't specify any obligation to convert the name ?

If you want to use case sensitive identifiers, then quote them! It's
not that hard. In your example above you're doing just that, so your
statement does not even apply ;)

Alban Hertroys

--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.

!DSPAM:737,47909a669491882451502!

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-01-18 12:43:08 Re: case dumbiness in return from functions
Previous Message Gregory Williamson 2008-01-18 12:39:16 Re: case dumbiness in return from functions