Re: Overhauling GUCS

From: "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS
Date: 2008-06-11 17:51:46
Message-ID: 485010B2.4060102@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Heikki,
>
>> Ideally, of course, there would be no wal_buffers setting, and WAL
>> buffers would be allocated from shared_buffers pool on demand...
>>
>
> +1
>
> --Josh
>

+1

-Jignesh

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-06-11 17:56:19 Re: Overhauling GUCS
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-06-11 17:28:37 Re: Overhauling GUCS