Re: Overhauling GUCS

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, "Decibel!" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS
Date: 2008-06-06 16:21:57
Message-ID: 48496424.2050600@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Freitag, 6. Juni 2008 schrieb Joshua D. Drake:
>> That is where some 80% solution sample config files come in.
>
> Considering that writing a sample configuration file is trivial, yet I haven't
> seen a single one posted in the six or more years of GUC, I have no faith in
> this plan until I actually see it implemented.

I fail to see why anyone would bother with the amount of noise on this
thread. If people start leaning toward an actual solution, I am sure the
work will get done.

Joshua D. Drake

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2008-06-06 16:22:39 Re: Overhauling GUCS
Previous Message Jignesh K. Shah 2008-06-06 16:21:47 Proposal: New LWLockmode LW_OWNER