Re: Overhauling GUCS

From: Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS
Date: 2008-06-05 18:43:08
Message-ID: 484833BC.40607@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> This is even assuming that the tool needs to edit the file itself,
> rather than just give advice. The advice is the hard part, folks;
> could we stop obsessing about trivia?
+1. IMHO, the tool doesn't need to worry about generating a prettied
version of postgresql.conf. It should just inform the user about the
appropriate settings or create a postgresql.conf.recommend and have the
user update postgresql.conf himself.

-Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-06-05 18:51:29 Re: "ERROR: operator is not unique" with Custom Data Type
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2008-06-05 18:37:28 Re: "ERROR: operator is not unique" with Custom Data Type