Re: proposal: Preference SQL

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Jan Urbański <j(dot)urbanski(at)students(dot)mimuw(dot)edu(dot)pl>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Decibel!" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: Preference SQL
Date: 2008-06-03 23:15:48
Message-ID: 4845D0A4.5050603@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Urbański wrote:
> Maybe I should talk to my thesis supervisor and find out if
> implementing window functions would be an equally good subject...
> I suppose having window functions would be a nice thing? To be honest
> - I need a thesis subject and I like fiddling with Postgres.

Window functions are on the TODO list and a good implementation is
something we really really want.

You will get far less resistance than for your original idea.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sushant Sinha 2008-06-04 00:14:32 Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline
Previous Message Jan Urbański 2008-06-03 22:48:43 Re: proposal: Preference SQL