Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Mike Rylander <mrylander(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Date: 2008-05-31 15:14:48
Message-ID: 48416B68.1060708@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 2:18 AM, Mike Rylander <mrylander(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum

> Compression especially is going to negate one of the big advantages of
> wal shipping, namely that it is cheap investment in terms of load to
> the main. A gigabit link can ship a lot of log files, you can always

Who has a gigabit link between Dallas and Atlanta? That is the actual
problem here. Switch to Switch compression is a waste of time (if you
aren't running GiGE, what are you doing???).

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2008-05-31 18:48:26 Re: Feedback on blog post about Replication Feature decision and its impact
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2008-05-31 14:21:41 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-05-31 15:14:58 Re: Overhauling GUCS
Previous Message Jan Urbański 2008-05-31 14:53:54 Re: proposal: Preference SQL