Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Date: 2008-05-30 21:05:57
Message-ID: 48406C35.9050409@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2008 23:02:56 -0400 Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>> Well, yes, but you do know about archive_timeout, right? No need to wait
>> 2 hours.
>>
>
> Then you ship 16 MB binary stuff every 30 second or every minute but
> you only have some kbyte real data in the logfile. This must be taken
> into account, especially if you ship the logfile over the internet
> (means: no high-speed connection, maybe even pay-per-traffic) to the
> slave.
>
>
>
>

Sure there's a price to pay. But that doesn't mean the facility doesn't
exist. And I rather suspect that most of Josh's customers aren't too
concerned about traffic charges or affected by such bandwidth
restrictions. Certainly, none of my clients are, and they aren't in the
giant class. Shipping a 16Mb file, particularly if compressed, every
minute or so, is not such a huge problem for a great many commercial
users, and even many domestic users.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gurjeet Singh 2008-05-30 21:18:51 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Previous Message Greg Smith 2008-05-30 20:22:41 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2008-05-30 21:18:45 Shouldn't Natural JOINs Follow FK Constraints?
Previous Message Greg Smith 2008-05-30 20:22:41 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL