Re: Guiding principle for dropping LLVM versions?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Xing Guo <higuoxing(at)gmail(dot)com>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Guiding principle for dropping LLVM versions?
Date: 2023-12-14 10:19:38
Message-ID: 483ae754-3241-444a-847a-41c1bd35be43@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 25.10.23 07:47, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Ideally more distros would be present in this vacuum-horizon decision
> table, but I don't think it'd change the conclusion: 10 is the
> trailing edge. Therefore the attached patch scales back its ambition
> to that release. Tested on LLVM 10-18.

This patch and the associated reasoning look good to me. I think this
is good to go for PG17.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2023-12-14 11:06:03 Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock
Previous Message Emre Hasegeli 2023-12-14 10:15:25 Re: "pgoutput" options missing on documentation