Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)salasaga(dot)org>
To: Jonathan Bond-Caron <jbondc(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "'A(dot) Kretschmer'" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules
Date: 2008-05-27 13:06:04
Message-ID: 483C073C.5060408@salasaga.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jonathan Bond-Caron wrote:
> The best patent ever filed:
>
> http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn965-wheel-patented-in-australia.html

Errr, you miss my point.

Those are (kind of) abstract examples. ;->

I'm trying to point out that - PG is a database system - and MS may have
just been granted a patent for a fundamental part of it.

Thinking it might need looking in to, and trying to bring it to the
attention of some that can (or even cares?). ;>

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

--
Salasaga - Open Source eLearning IDE
http://www.salasaga.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Miklosi Attila 2008-05-27 13:08:14 active queries
Previous Message Cindy Makarowsky 2008-05-27 12:47:59 PL/R download