Craig Ringer wrote:
> ${spencer} wrote:
>> is there a way to write a function without installing a specific
>> language? all i need to do is write a function that can take 3 text's
>> and put them into a list format (eg. "text1, text2 and text3" )
> Failing that, you might be able to use an SQL function (though I don't
> really see how you'd handle the special case for "and" without a
> subquery to obtain a total result count)
... if the input was a set of `text', not 3 individual `text' arguments.
Whoops. It's trivially done with plain SQL.
--
Craig Ringer