Re: stored procedure stats in collector

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com>, Volkan YAZICI <yazicivo(at)ttmail(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at
Subject: Re: stored procedure stats in collector
Date: 2008-05-14 07:29:11
Message-ID: 482A94C7.5090208@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Shouldn't we at least make it fail with EINVAL if "who" doesn't match
>>> whichever semantics this code is able to implement?
>
>> Yeah, we only ever call it asking for our own process, but I guess we
>> might at some point in the future change that, so it can't hurt.. Want
>> me to do it, or will you?
>
> Please do, I'm going to bed ...

Done.

//Magnus

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ranjit singh 2008-05-14 07:33:50 how to perform silent installation on linux and solaris
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-05-14 06:20:14 Re: stored procedure stats in collector

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-05-14 12:18:30 Re: libpq object hooks
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-05-14 06:20:14 Re: stored procedure stats in collector