Re: Re: BUG #4053: libpq documentation should express clearly, that integers are passed in network octet order

From: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Aleksej Saushev <asau(at)inbox(dot)ru>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: BUG #4053: libpq documentation should express clearly, that integers are passed in network octet order
Date: 2008-05-08 17:04:49
Message-ID: 482332B1.1010202@esilo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Agreed that libpqtypes would solve the problem, but the odd thing to me
> is that we have gotten very few requests for binary format information
> since we added binary prepared parameters years ago, so is no one
> actually using it?
>

I think part of the answer is lack of documentation and possibly how
tedious of an API call PQexecParams can be. If anything, using the
parameterized method promotes much better "safer" coding practices, but
currently its at quite a programming effort cost.

--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-05-09 03:37:02 Submitting security bugs
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2008-05-08 16:44:50 Re: Re: BUG #4053: libpq documentation should express clearly, that integers are passed in network octet order