Re: alter + preserving dependencies

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Dimitri Fontaine" <dim(at)hi-media(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: alter + preserving dependencies
Date: 2008-05-07 14:45:56
Message-ID: 48217A50.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Dimitri Fontaine <dim(at)hi-media(dot)com> writes:
>> My 8.3.1 installation psql \h only gives me:
>> Syntax:
>> ALTER VIEW name RENAME TO newname
>
> You're not the first person to think that ALTER VIEW covers
everything
> that can be done to a view.
>
> I'm starting to think that we should just make ALTER VIEW be an
alias
> for ALTER TABLE (rather than a separate node type as now), and then
list
> in the ALTER VIEW reference page all of the ALTER TABLE variants
that
> will work on views.

>From a DBA perspective, it reduces the risk of error if ALTER TABLE
only affects tables, not views, and ALTER VIEW only affects views, not
tables.

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2008-05-07 14:47:36 Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-05-07 14:41:56 pgsql: Make the pg_stat_activity view call a SRF