Re: Patch for Prevent pg_dump/pg_restore from being affected by statement_timeout

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for Prevent pg_dump/pg_restore from being affected by statement_timeout
Date: 2008-05-04 17:55:29
Message-ID: 481DF891.6090707@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> Committed with slight editorializing. Statement timeout was only
>> introduced in 7.3, whereas pg_dump can dump from much older versions
>> of Postgres.
>>
> You forget a ; in this committ [1].
>
> [1] http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2008-05/msg00028.php
>

I need to stop doing things late at night.

fixed.

cheers

andrew.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2008-05-04 19:44:58 Query Hints? No thanks. Data hints?
Previous Message Florian Weimer 2008-05-04 17:38:45 Re: Protection from SQL injection

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-05-04 21:23:33 Re: pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-05-04 16:49:15 Re: [HACKERS] Text <-> C string