From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fix \dT enum in psql |
Date: | 2008-05-02 03:07:42 |
Message-ID: | 481A857E.4090709@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
David Fetter wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 10:53:00PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> David Fetter wrote:
>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> In psql, \dT doesn't show the elements for enums. Please find
>>> patch vs. CVS TIP attached which fixes this per the following TODO
>>> item:
>>>
>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-01/msg00826.php
>>>
>> I don't have a particular problem with this patch - indeed the query
>> in it looks eerily familiar :-)
>>
>
> I can't imagine why ;)
>
>
>> However, I'm wondering if we should wait until a possible rework of
>> the mechanics of enums as recently discussed? Or we could put it in
>> and that way it would have to be redone when enums are rejigged.
>>
>
> I'm thinking getting it in there soon will keep the bitrot to a
> minimum. One thing it doesn't include is regression tests. Shall I
> add a few?
>
>
>
not sure that we do regression tests for psql features ...
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-02 03:41:46 | pgsql: Sigh ... |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2008-05-02 02:58:38 | Re: Fix \dT enum in psql |