Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL

From: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Euler Taveira de Oliveira" <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "postgres performance list" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL
Date: 2008-04-28 10:59:48
Message-ID: 4815AE24.60909@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-performance

Gregory Stark wrote:
> TPC-E has more stringent requirements which explicitly require very consistent
> response times and I doubt 8.2 would have been able to pass them.

Sure it would. Just not for a very large scale factor ;-).

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2008-04-28 16:07:36 Re: Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2008-04-28 09:17:08 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gauri Kanekar 2008-04-28 13:38:56 Replication Syatem
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2008-04-28 09:17:08 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL