| From: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Regression test fails when BLCKSZ is 1kB |
| Date: | 2008-04-22 08:38:03 |
| Message-ID: | 480DA3EB.4050101@sun.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan napsal(a):
>
>
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Am Montag, 21. April 2008 schrieb Martijn van Oosterhout:
>>
>>> I wonder if it would be feasable to, whenever a regression test fails
>>> to sort both files and compare again. This should tell you if the
>>> difference are *only* rearrangement automatically, without having to
>>> eyeball the output.
>>>
>>
>> That sounds like it should be worth a try.
>>
>
> I think we need first to identify cases where we don't care that much
> about output order. Teaching pg-regress the new check shouldn't be very
> hard.
It seems to me only ORDER BY clauses must return sort order. Or are there any
other cases?
Zdenek
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2008-04-22 09:13:30 | Re: Regression test fails when BLCKSZ is 1kB |
| Previous Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2008-04-22 08:31:53 | Re: Regression test fails when BLCKSZ is 1kB |