Re: JDBC addBatch more efficient?

Does this means that the two features are independent one from each other ?
In other words, can we say that JDBC batch will limit information
exchange between client and server while Postgres prepared statements
will optimize their execution ?

Kris Jurka ha scritto:
>
>
> On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, David Wall wrote:
>
>> Just checking if the JDBC library's batch processing code is more
>> efficient with respect to the postgresql back end or not. Does it
>> really batch the requests and submit them once over the link, or does
>> it just send them to the database to be processed one at a time?
>>
>
> The JDBC driver's batch processing is more efficient than regular
> execution because it requires fewer network roundtrips so there's less
> waiting. The JDBC batch is broken into an internal batch size of 256
> statement and all of these are sent over to the server at once.
>
> Kris Jurka
>

--
==================================================
Archimede Informatica NEWS!
==================================================

Realizzato il Sistema Integrato per la biglietteria della Torre di Pisa:
prenotazione, vendita, pre-vendita ed emissione dei biglietti di ingresso
alla Torre sia online che presso le biglietterie dislocate sulla piazza:

_http://www.opapisa.it/boxoffice

_Partner del Progetto Ci-Tel "Front office Telematico per il cittadino"
Ente Coordinatore Comune di Pisa

_http://www.comune.pisa.it/doc/e-government.htm

_==================================================
dott. Ivano Mario Luberti
Archimede Informatica societa' cooperativa a r. l.
Sede Operativa
Via Gereschi 36 - 56126- Pisa
tel.: +39-050- 580959
tel/fax: +39-050-9711344
e-mail: archimede(at)archicoop(dot)it
web: _http://www.archicoop.it

_ <http://www.archicoop.it/>__ <http://www.archicoop.it/>