Re: How to submit a patch

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: How to submit a patch
Date: 2008-04-16 20:36:13
Message-ID: 4806633D.4030604@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Merlin Moncure wrote:
> I've been mostly following this discussion on
> this particular topic but have absolutely no idea what, if anything,
> to do on the wiki in terms of submitting patch.
>

I think the short answer right now to this and to Joshua's original
question is: to submit a patch do what has always been done, i.e. send
the patch to the mailing list. You can also add the patch to the list on
the wiki, but if you don't, it won't be forgotten.

All the rest is for reviewers/committers.

I've been wondering idly and probably pointlessly if we should try
adopting something like the methodology of the Usenet Oracle, which, if
you ask it a question will usually send you one to answer in return.
Obviously we can't always do that, but maybe we should be asking people
who are obviously competent enough (judging by the quality and
complexity of the patches they submit) to step up to the plate more on
reviewing patches. No amount of process will substitute for more reviewers.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2008-04-16 20:49:03 Re: Timely reporting of COPY errors
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2008-04-16 20:29:07 Timely reporting of COPY errors

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2008-04-16 23:02:06 Re: How to submit a patch
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-04-16 20:21:10 Re: How to submit a patch